Differentiate and qualify suppliers #271

Open
opened 2021-06-11 17:37:42 +02:00 by maxi · 3 comments
maxi commented 2021-06-11 17:37:42 +02:00 (Migrated from gitlab.weber-bodman.de)

@fmeis suggests to clearly mark suppliers as I, II, III and to show if only an offer has been requested or if it's a regular supplier where the next order should be placed off.

This could happen in an article's suppliers list view where contractor relations for finishing steps and contract work could also be maintained.

Also previous and subsequent processing steps should be indicated clearly.

@fmeis suggests to clearly mark suppliers as I, II, III and to show if only an offer has been requested or if it's a regular supplier where the next order should be placed off. This could happen in an article's suppliers list view where contractor relations for finishing steps and contract work could also be maintained. Also previous and subsequent processing steps should be indicated clearly.
maxi commented 2021-06-11 17:44:31 +02:00 (Migrated from gitlab.weber-bodman.de)

changed the description

changed the description
maxi commented 2021-06-11 17:45:53 +02:00 (Migrated from gitlab.weber-bodman.de)

changed the description

changed the description
maxi commented 2022-11-04 13:47:05 +01:00 (Migrated from gitlab.weber-bodman.de)

mentioned in issue #367

mentioned in issue #367
Sign in to join this conversation.
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference
maxi/inmax#271
No description provided.